Something I didn't know...and hope you want to know...
and please read to the last to see update
The following text is from "Letters from an American," Sept 9, 2023
On Thursday, excerpts from a forthcoming biography of Elon Musk by historian Walter Isaacson revealed that Musk “secretly told his engineers to turn off [Starlink] coverage within 100 kilometers of the Crimean coast” after learning that the Ukrainian military was sending six small drone submarines packed with explosives at the Russian naval fleet based in Crimea. After talking to Russian leaders, who said they would respond with nuclear weapons—later events suggest this was a bluff—Musk shut off Starlink, the drone submarines lost the connectivity they needed to find their targets, and the weapons simply washed ashore.** (NOTE BELOW COMMENT REGARDING THIS)
According to Isaacson, Ukrainian officials begged Musk to turn the coverage back on, but he refused, saying that Ukraine “is now going too far and inviting strategic defeat.” He told U.S. and Russian officials that he wanted Starlink to be used only for defense. Then he offered a “peace plan” that required Ukraine to give up territory to Russia and reject plans to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Later, he again disabled Starlink coverage in the midst of a Ukrainian advance.
Isaacson portrays Musk as frustrated by being dragged into a war. “Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars,” Musk told Isaacson. “It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.” Since the story broke, Musk has defended his unwillingness to be in the middle of a war.
But Mykhailo Podolyak, a top advisor to Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky, pointed out on Musk’s own social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, that the same Russian fleet Musk protected went on to fire missiles at Ukrainian cities, killing civilians, including children. Russia is also attacking Ukraine’s infrastructure for exporting grain, which threatens the price and availability of food in Africa.
The privatization of the functions of government in the U.S. has given a single man the power to affect global affairs, working, in this case, against the stated objectives of our own government. Republican leaders eager to push that privatization have made their case by turning voters against taxes, although the tax cuts put in place since 1981 overwhelmingly benefited the wealthy and corporations, permitting a few individuals to amass fortunes: Forbes, for example, estimates Musk’s net worth at $251.3 billion.
On Friday the Internal Revenue Service announced that increased federal funding under the Inflation Reduction Act and the help of artificial intelligence will enable a new push to go after 1,600 millionaires who owe at least $250,000 and 75 large businesses with assets of about $10 billion apiece that owe hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes.
Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), chair of the Senate Finance Committee, said the plan “goes to the heart of Democrats’ effort to ensure the wealthiest are paying their fair share.” It also goes to the heart of the idea that billionaires must not be able to impose their will on the rest of us by virtue of their monopolization of key aspects of our infrastructure. Still, Republicans continue to argue for private investment according to market forces. Opposing taxes and the government programs they fund, they have clawed back as much of the new funding for the IRS as they have been able, and they continue to call for more cuts.
This week, as a fight over funding the government by the end of the month looms, the implications of the parties’ different visions of government could not be clearer. "
** NOTE UPDATE from CBS Sunday Morning interview with Isaacson, correcting the earlier statement..."In fact, as Isaacson has acknowledged, that's not quite what happened. Starlink wasn't running in that region in the first place," says interviewer, David Pogue, "but when Ukraine asked for service there, Musk did decline to activate it." Sept. 10, 2023 interview.
...is Elon Musk a US Citizen?
ReplyDeleteI don't know. in 2020 Newsweek published that his US citizenship was under legal investigation.
DeleteIt is quite the deal. Monopoly on information. I read that Musk said it wasn't on, but that was discounted by some Ukraine defenders!
ReplyDeleteInteresting. The whole idea that one power-hungry man can manipulate the world efforts...Big Brother has arrived and I'm shared S**tless!
DeleteI do not like Elon Musk! Take care, have a great day and a happy week ahead!
ReplyDeleteNot much to like about him.
DeleteThe man once had a fantastic reputation. It didn't take him long to ruin it.
ReplyDeleteTrue. But his reach of power is worse than tRump in my estimation today!
DeleteI think that last sentence is important. Starlink wasn’t there in the first place. Like Trump, Musk has a great fear of nuclear threats. This is understandable. Unfortunately, keeping peace is not that simple. I don’t know what I would do if someone threatened nuclear war as a result of my actions.
ReplyDeleteIn any case, one person should not have so much power. He does not seem to be tremendously intelligent, probably slightly above average intellect, and if reporters are correct, he is below average in social intelligence. In any case, I would not want to be in his shoes.
All good points. He does admit to being ADHD, which usually indicates some social handicap.
Deletea country's national defense should not be in the hand of a single individual/citizen. I don't trust a thing Musk has to say, especially if he's talking to Putin. Ukraine needed Starlink but the Russians didn't? or rather they did and got what they wanted with a threat. I read HCR's newsletters too.
ReplyDeleteGlad you already read about this. Sorry I tend to repeat some of hers and Robert Reich's newsletters. I learn more from them than anything broadcast. Yes, the nuclear threat is the awful card that must not be dealt.
DeleteMusk is a problem for the world.
ReplyDelete